Secret Parent Worry: Packing Lunch

by Danielle Veith


With the number of days until my daughter finishes preschool now in the single digits, it’s time to start stressing about kindergarten--99 days to go! I’m sure there are any number of things I could get hung up on, but my angst has landed on … school lunches.

​At least I know she'll find a way to get a drink of water.

​At least I know she'll find a way to get a drink of water.

When I was in elementary school (if you’re my mom, you can stop reading here), I threw away more of my lunches than I ate. We were vegetarian at a time when that had no cool factor. Tofu was a punchline, but it was also between two slices of bread in my little brown bag. I did not want to be different in any way and did my best to hide anything beyond the granola bar or whatever else seemed like something other kids’ moms would pack.

We’re raising our kids vegetarian as well, and my daughter is just learning that her best friends aren’t vegetarian, too. I’m waiting to see what she thinks of this. Maybe she’ll be less worried than I was—she’s certainly less shy than I was.

Kids today, at least in our neck of the woods, with all their allergies and whatnot, are more exposed to different diets and that there are foods certain kids can’t or don’t eat. So there’s a good chance that my daughter’s hang-ups will be different than mine. But I find my stress about not being too different when it comes to food still lingers.

And my daughter is not a big eater anyway. Unless pretzels or ice cream are involved or if it’s a second Tuesday and a waning new moon or whatever it is that makes her eat like crazy on seemingly random days. She could live on air for long stretches and never eat a thing I pack.

Of course, I’d rather fill her with healthy options for a growing body, nourish her expanding mind and keep her energy-level on an even keel. So, I’m starting to brainstorm lists of sandwiches and snacks that I can pack when I send her off this fall, and will try to add to this list as the summer drags on and the days count down.

(Now I just need to figure out what the cool kids are packing their lunches in these days. I’m guessing brown bags are out, especially in our environmentally-minded community. And not sure the Buffy the Vampire Slayer metal lunchbox we have for reasons forgotten would go over well with my little girl.)

School lunch ideas for kindergarten and beyond—happy to hear more suggestions!

On the main stage--

-        peanut butter and jelly (how much more “normal” could you get?)

-        cheese rolled up in a tortilla (note to try this at home first)

-        mini bagel with cream cheese

-        falafel in a mini pita

-        mini ravioli or tortellini with butter and parmesan

-        spaghetti o type things

-        rice and beans (not sure this will fly for lunch, even if it’s a fav for dinner)

And if those go uneaten… the understudies--

-        smoothie (will this be gross by lunchtime?)

-        homemade trail mix

-        granola bar or granola

-        veggies-baby carrots, sweet peppers, green beans

-        whole fruit-apple, clementine, pear, grapes

-        hummus and carrots

-        soysage, sliced in bites

-        cheese cubes, cheddar only

-        yogurt (I’ve heard you should freeze the tubes?)

-        applesauce

-        hard-boiled eggs (hasn’t worked since age 2)

-        squash soup

-        dried fruit or raisins

-        edamame

-        rice cake

-        squeezies (like these)

If you want to read my next post, don't forget to LIKE my Facebook page.


In Defense of Reading (Parenting Books)

by Danielle Veith


In defense of reading? Sounds weird, right? Because if it would seem absurd to defend reading, why should one need to defend reading parenting books? Why would almost every person who becomes a parent make a vow that they’ll never be one of THOSE parents who read parenting books? Why does nearly every ridiculous attack on parents contain an obligatory line dissing parenting books and parenting blogs? Why should it be embarrassing to read about something you care about?

“Don’t worry, you’ll do fine as a mom. You’re not a crack-head and you have the Internet.” So said some half-crazy guy I knew while I was pregnant with my first baby. Well, five years later, I’m still not a crack head and, yes, I have used the Internet quite a bit to learn more about this parenting gig. Of course, you may not have heard this already, but there’s occasionally some misinformation that works it’s way around cyberspace. Thankfully, we have these people called writers and editors who have worked hard to bring us some pretty wonderful books on the subject.

But, of course, you would never read any of them, would you? How uncool.

I don’t get it. It would be like saying, “I would never read history books. Just live your life, dude. Don’t think too much about it.” If those who don’t study history are doomed to repeat it, those who never read a word written by another parent (and who are probably also too embarrassed to talk about being a parent), are doomed to make mistakes they could avoid. I speak from experience: most of these mistakes involve yelling. Because, in isolation, you have no idea that what your kid is going through is normal and that how you are feeling is normal.

That said, I’m pretty sure I said I would never read parenting books before I had a baby. And then it changed to, I would only “use” baby books as a reference to look up things like how to cure diaper rash. Well, as new parents are destined to discover, we could pay for our kids’ college education with a dollar for every thing we said we’d never do.

Like others of my generation, I came into parenting already feeling very defensive. I was terrified of being one of those people who, god forbid, changes when they become a parent. Maybe it’s something about becoming a parent later in life when we’ve already established our own adult identity so firmly. Or maybe it’s an unfortunate byproduct of the whole women being allowed out of their home thing. If we can be more than “just a mom,” it’s hard not to feel as if we should be something else and that being a parent makes you less than, rather than more than, you were before.

Whatever the reason, there is an attitude toward reading parenting books that it would be hard to imagine being acceptable toward any other form of reading. Like any genre, there are plenty of parenting books not worth reading. But anything you care about—like say, your offspring—is worth learning more about, and reading is (believe it or not!) a long-standing, well-respected way to learn things.

Honestly, my problem with reading parenting books and parenting blogs is that actual parenting takes up a lot of the time that I used to spend reading. And being a mom is such a 24-7 affair that it can be hard to want to spend more time thinking about the kids once they’re finally asleep. I’m all for escaping with a good novel or curling up with a fun magazine, but every time I have spent time reading books or blogs about parenting, I have learned something. And it has always made me feel—like the best books do—less alone and less crazy.

From parenting books, I have learned that the horrible behavior my daughter has just picked up and that I’m screaming at her about is developmentally normal… and that it will pass. And I have stopped yelling about it and life became less exhausting for a little while. Louise Bates Ames’ Your <fill in the blacnk> Year Old series is widely-regarded as being especially great for that kind of perspective.

Other books have offered very practical help, with ideas I may have come to on my own, but just as possibly may not have. Elizabeth Pantley’s No Cry Sleep Solution was one, and whatever you think of Dr. Sears, his The Baby Book has lots of easy to read basic care info for babies.

I’ve also read some books that made me feel more connected to other mothers and that have given me a deeper understanding of my own self as a mother. Judith Warner’s Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety is one example. Another (although I confess I only read excerpts) is Bringing Up Bebe: One American Mother Discovers the Wisdom of French Parenting by Pamela Druckerman. I’m curious about but haven’t yet read Building Resilience in Children and Teens: Giving Kids Roots and Wings by Kenneth R. Ginsburg.

There’s this idea out there that if you read parenting books, you will lose the ability to trust your gut. It’s rubbish. Do we ignore non-fiction books completely because the ideas in them might supplant everything we knew before we opened the book? Of course not. We hope we learn something from them that will deepen our knowledge or open us to a different way of thinking. How are parenting books any different?

So, read on, my friends, and worry not about being judged for wanting to learn about this thing that, you must admit, matters to you.

If you want to read my next post, don't forget to LIKE my Facebook page.


Parenting Through a Week of Hard News

by Danielle Veith


There are nights when, putting my children in their comfortable beds, asleep or nearly there, it seems like an absolute miracle that I have managed to keep them safe for another day. Not an accomplishment, more like dumb luck.

And when there’s a story of a child whose parents ran out of luck, it’s easy to hold onto it and hard to let go. I’m a sponge for grief. I soak it in and hold it like it’s all that fills me, like I’d be empty if I wasn’t able to breathe in the sadness of the world.

This has been a very sad week. Ridiculously sad. The story of the eight-year old boy who hugged his father who’d just finished running the Boston marathon, just before returning to his mother’s side to be killed in an inexplicable bomb attack, that’s just one of the of this week’s sad stories.

Yesterday, as I flipped between CNN and MSNBC, immersed in the anxiety of a breaking news day, I felt a deep sadness for the mother of the two bomb suspects, the 19-year-old who was still on the run, his young face plastered across the screen, and his 26-year-old brother, who was already dead.

Of course, I felt tremendous grief for the victims of these violent acts. We all say prayers for them while the world watches and we hope we don’t forget them long before they heal. But our sadness does not end with the images of those hurt and killed in the bombings.

There was a photo (on this Facebook page) of the younger son in the ambulance after his capture. I just kept staring at it last night and imagining—what if it was my son laying there and I’m half way around the world and hear that he has done this terrible thing, and maybe I believe it or maybe I don’t, but if I do, I don’t understand how the child I love could be so full of hate and I don’t know why or what led to this, but I see that he is seriously injured, bleeding, in an ambulance with people who hate him and wish he was dead or worse, and he’s alone and I’m not there.

I found it utterly heartbreaking to imagine what his mother must have been feeling. What an evil nightmare. What if my child committed a horrible crime, took away the lives of other people’s children? Would I still love him and want for him not to be alone? Of course, I can’t say, but I imagined myself wanting to be with my child, even in this horrible moment, and wanting to hold him.

As David Remnick of The New Yorker wrote, “…as the day was coming to an end, you could not help but feel something, too, for the parents of the perpetrators, neither of whom could fathom the possibility of their sons’ guilt, much less their cruelty and evil… their sons were gone—one dead, the other wounded, hospitalized, and under arrest.”

I’m heartbroken as I imagine these parents trying to understand what happened. Heartbroken even after I hear the mother claim her sons were framed by the FBI, and even after the father brushes off his older son’s domestic violence incident, saying, “In America, you can’t touch a woman.” I’m heartbroken for all of the mothers whose children grew up in war-torn Chechnya, a place that may only be tangentially related to these boys, these men, but the point remains. There are mothers across the world whose children become radicalized, who become pathological, who become murderers, terrorists. And it’s not easy to say how this happens. And it’s incredibly sad.

Every bomber is someone’s child. And their violent acts injure and kill other people’s children. Would it change anything to think of things this way? Maybe not, but it’s hard not to when the perpetrators are so young and when those killed are so young.

There are mothers across the world whose children are not safe tonight. And some nights, it’s hard to sleep, thinking of them, even if those thoughts alone do nothing to help. Maybe it was Chechnya a decade ago, but today the mothers of children being killed in Syria are not able to keep their children safe. Mothers in Pakistan are not able to keep their children safe, mothers in Iraq, mothers in Gaza and in Israel are not always able to keep their children safe.

Honestly, I can’t name every place in the world where children are not safe, where improvised explosive devices are just as devastating, though perhaps not as shocking as they are to American mothers. I do know that American mothers have been shaken at least twice just in the past few months from our operating assumption that our children are safe. Though mothers in places like Chicago and Detroit may have been disabused of this notion for some time.

I live with my children in the national capital region, so it’s not as if emergency preparedness is a foreign concept. But the feeling that my children may be in danger when they go off to elementary school, as my daughter will this fall, or that we would be in danger of being killed by an IED while attending a nonpolitical public event, these fears are new.

And there are other stories that shake me as a parent, of mothers who could not keep their children safe. Before Boston and before the mass killings in Connecticut, it seemed that more and more often, I had to turn off the radio so my four year old daughter wouldn’t ask me about pedophilia or child sexual abuse. So I wouldn’t have to tell her that I won’t always be able to keep her safe.

Watching and listening to the news is important to me as an intelligent, informed adult. It’s important to me as a stay-at-home parent. There are times when my life feels very small and isolated. When I turn on the news while the baby’s napping, it’s a kind of grown-up time for me. As bad as cable news can be, it still makes my world a bigger place, connects me back into what’s going on outside my house at that moment.

So I watch. But it’s come to seem as if, every day when I come downstairs after getting my son to sleep for naptime, CNN has breaking news of another incident of gun violence. One day there were two at once. And I can become so caught up in it. So afraid. All the time. For a while, every quiet moment I had in my home brought on intense anxiety about someone breaking in and hurting my children.

Some days it feels like the world is conspiring to make middle class American women like me feel terrified all the time. Like it would be an act of resistance if I could be fearless. Have you seen an ad for a home alarm company recently? Apparently those alarms are made solely to keep young, white women and children safe in their nice homes. At times, it’s not healthy, and I do try to turn it off when it’s stops informing me and becomes nothing more than fuel for panic.

For instance, if you want to bring on a panic attack, I recommend going to the gym and watching coverage of the Boston marathon bombings while running on the treadmill. Which I did on Tuesday because I wanted to know what happened and putting my kids in gym daycare while I watched the horrible news seemed like better parenting than watching at home.

After the Connecticut school shootings, I took some time away from the news, even from NPR, which is often better at maintaining perspective during breaking news moments than is cable news. It wasn’t easy for an amateur news junkie, but it was clearly a story to keep away from my daughter, who is nervous enough about going off to kindergarten without knowing this about the world. It actually felt weird not telling her, sheltering her from the idea that there is suffering and danger in the world. But she’s four and that’s my job right now.

An elementary school teacher once offered me this guide: Tell them about difficult things when they can do something about it. If knowing some hard news would keep my daughter safe, she should know. There’s plenty of time ahead for her to be crushed by the full weight of the awful tragedies that unfold every day.

Or maybe she will be more resilient than her mother. I would feel very accomplished if the sadness of the world only ever leaves my children feeling crushed to the extent that they can do something about it.

A few days after the tragedy in Connecticut and all those babies lost, I found myself at a monthly parents meeting at my daughter’s preschool. During a discussion of how to talk to our kids (there was general agreement that our preschoolers didn’t need to know a thing) and what kinds of emergency procedures are in place at our school, I became more and more panicked until I didn’t want to ever let my kids out of my sight again. Not really, of course, but how was every parent not feeling that? Instead, I heard parent after parent speak in calm, reasonable voices about their kids being at greater risk riding in the car every day. When I hear these things, I usually think, these are the facts you repeat to yourself in an effort to restore calm. Instead, these things were spoken from a place of calm. One mother reversed the tide, saying “Actually, I don’t know what to say to my kids. I don’t feel safe. I can’t tell them the world is a safe place,” quieting the room for a moment before the general tone of reassurance returned.

Mostly, these tragedies come and go and the impact most of us feel fades away. For the mothers, the fathers, the families, the suffering is personal, private, the impact is lasting. Still, what is often called “normal” follows the shootings and the bombings. But for some of us, the loss accumulates in a different way. We are depleted or we are numbed. I know we can’t live our lives under the full weight of all of these tragedies all day, every day. As people keep saying, We Can’t Let the Terrorists Win. I don’t know that the terrorists lose if we forget quickly, if we are back at work the next day. Of course, we can’t stand still and feel the tragedy the same way, day after day. That’s insanity, or at least PTSD.

I struggle a lot with the guilt of letting go, of shutting it out and moving on. I’m someone who has long struggled in this way. And now I’m also a mother. My instinct is to obsessively watch tragedies unfold until they are over. But now I try to turn it off. I want to cry, but I make lunch and take my kids outside. It helps no one who is hurting for me to feel this way. Maybe it will make me healthier, being forced to continue as if life is just the same. Maybe not. But I hope with every fiber of my being that it will make my kids healthier. Maybe if my children don’t learn to react in this way, they will have something left inside to figure out what they might do to help.

At her preschool, my daughter learns resiliency in countless small ways. The teachers talk about “hard news,” how some things large and small are hard to hear, and they work through it in dramatic play. They teach the kids about “getting stuck.” When there are tantrums and meltdowns, her teacher goes to the child and says to them, “I see that you’re feeling stuck.” And the kids learn to use these words themselves and to let go and move on. I watch them do this and I wish someone had taught me. I don’t do well with trouble. When hard news hits, I get stuck.

My daughter’s teacher reads stories that would have scared me as a child. They learn about “trouble” and how “If there’s no trouble, the story’s over.” As she’s reading, no one wants for the story to end, so they read through the trouble. My daughter, once very afraid of any mild tension in a tv show, has begun to sit longer with her discomfort. She remembers what her teacher said and will tell me, “This is the trouble. But it’s ok, it will get better.”

There may be no promise of a happy end to real-life trouble, but it’s still true that if there was no trouble, the story would be over.

Today we feel some resolution as a country. There is a collective exhaling as the police apprehended the second bombing suspect. The good guys got the bad guy. Even if it is so much more complicated than that, we all need, eventually, to feel like the trouble is over, to feel safe, even if next to nothing has changed. Our life is full of small stories. Today we need for our next story, the story of this day, this sunny spring day when the kids want to go outside and play, to begin. 

If you want to read my next post, don't forget to LIKE my Facebook page.